Taipei Medical University

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Cheng H-C, Chen C-F, Chao W-H, Tsai C-Y
------>authors3_c=None
------>paper_class1=2
------>Impact_Factor=None
------>paper_class3=0
------>paper_class2=0
------>vol=
------>confirm_bywho=seanlee
------>insert_bywho=cytsai
------>Jurnal_Rank=None
------>authors4_c=None
------>comm_author=
------>patent_EDate=None
------>authors5_c=None
------>publish_day=None
------>paper_class2Letter=None
------>page2=
------>medlineContent=
------>unit=F0200
------>insert_date=20000601
------>iam=4
------>update_date=
------>author=???
------>change_event=5
------>ISSN=None
------>authors_c=None
------>score=23
------>journal_name=Chin. Dent. J.
------>paper_name=Orthodontic treatment of Angles Class II division 2 malocclusion.
------>confirm_date=20010330
------>tch_id=081003
------>pmid=19194675
------>page1=
------>fullAbstract=OBJECTIVE: To examine the treatment and post-treatment effects of the Herbst-Multibracket (MB) appliance on facial profile and lip position in adult Class II, Division 2 subjects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lateral head films of 16 consecutively-treated adult Class II, Division 2 subjects (8 males, 8 females) with an average age of 18.8 years pre-treatment were analyzed on three occasions: before treatment (T1), after Herbst-MB treatment (T2) and 2 years post-treatment (T3). RESULTS: Treatment period (T2-T1): an increase occurred in the hard tissue profile angle (2.5 degrees; p < 0.001), the soft tissue profile angle excluding the nose (2.6 degrees ; p < 0.01), and the soft tissue profile angle including the nose (1.8 degrees; p < 0.05). The upper lip became more retrusive in relation to the Esthetic line (EL) (0.8 mm; p < 0.05) while the lower lip~s position was unchanged. Lower lip coverage of the upper incisors was reduced (0.8 mm; p < 0.05). Post-treatment period (T3-T2): the soft tissue profile angle (excluding the nose) increased (1.6 degrees; p < 0.01), while the hard and soft tissue profile angles including the nose remained unchanged. Both, the upper and lower lips became more retrusive in relation to the EL (0.9 mm; p < 0.01 and 1.0 mm; p < 0.001). The lower lip coverage of the upper incisors remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: The hard and soft tissue profiles were straightened during Herbst-MB treatment, including a brief follow-up period. The lips became more retrusive while the lower lip coverage of the upper incisors was reduced.
------>tmu_sno=None
------>sno=1444
------>authors2=None
------>authors3=None
------>authors4=None
------>authors5=None
------>authors6=None
------>authors6_c=None
------>authors=Cheng H-C, Chen C-F, Chao W-H, Tsai C-Y
------>delete_flag=0
------>SCI_JNo=None
------>authors2_c=None
------>publish_area=None
------>updateTitle=Facial profile and lip position changes in adult Class II, Division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst-Multibracket appliance. A radiographic cephalometric pilot study.
------>language=1
------>check_flag=
------>submit_date=
------>country=None
------>no=
------>patent_SDate=None
------>update_bywho=
------>publish_year=2000
------>submit_flag=
------>publish_month=None
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z