Taipei Medical University

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Lin HC
------>authors3_c=
------>paper_class1=1
------>Impact_Factor=5.947
------>paper_class3=2
------>paper_class2=1
------>vol=
------>confirm_bywho=nwkuo
------>insert_bywho=henry11111
------>Jurnal_Rank=11.1
------>authors4_c=
------>comm_author=1
------>patent_EDate=None
------>authors5_c=
------>publish_day=1
------>paper_class2Letter=None
------>page2=
------>medlineContent=
------>unit=E0800
------>insert_date=20080721
------>iam=1
------>update_date=None
------>author=???
------>change_event=4
------>ISSN=
------>authors_c=
------>score=447
------>journal_name=Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
------>paper_name=Volume-Outcome Relation for Pulmonary Embolism Treatment: Association between Physician and Hospital Volume and 30-day Mortality
------>confirm_date=20080807
------>tch_id=090053
------>pmid=18662261
------>page1=
------>fullAbstract=OBJECTIVE: This study sets out to examine the association between physician and hospital pulmonary embolism (PE) caseload volume and subsequent patient outcomes using 3-year nationwide population-based data in Taiwan. METHOD: This study used claims data from the 2002-2004 National Health Insurance Research Database. The sample of 2761 PE inpatients was divided into three physician caseload volume groups, <3 cases (low volume), 3-6 cases (medium volume) and >or=7 cases (high volume), while the three hospital volume groups were <42 cases (low volume), 42-110 cases (medium volume) and >or=111 cases (high volume). A conditional logistic regression model was performed to evaluate the effects of caseload volume on 30-day mortality for PE treatment. RESULTS: Patients treated by low case volume physicians had significantly higher mortality rates than those treated by medium case volume (19.0% vs. 13.3%, P < 0.001) or high case volume physicians (19.0% vs. 8.4%, P < 0.001). However, no significant relationship was observed between 30-day morality and hospital caseload volume (P = 0.697). The regression shows that the adjusted odds of 30-day mortality among patients of low case volume physicians were over twice the mortality odds among patients of high case volume physicians (OR = 2.164, P < 0.001), and odds ratios were 1.401 relative to medium case volume physicians~ patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We conclude that an inverse PE volume-outcome relationship does exist for physicians, but not for hospitals. The skill or experience of an individual physician is a more critical factor than hospital equipment, infrastructure or staffing team in determining PE patient outcomes.
------>tmu_sno=None
------>sno=18739
------>authors2=Lee HC
------>authors3=
------>authors4=
------>authors5=
------>authors6=
------>authors6_c=
------>authors=Lin HC
------>delete_flag=0
------>SCI_JNo=None
------>authors2_c=
------>publish_area=0
------>updateTitle=Caseload volume-outcome relation for pulmonary embolism treatment: association between physician and hospital caseload volume and 30-day mortality.
------>language=2
------>check_flag=None
------>submit_date=None
------>country=None
------>no=
------>patent_SDate=None
------>update_bywho=None
------>publish_year=2008
------>submit_flag=None
------>publish_month=1
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z