Taipei Medical University

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
W.-C. Huang
------>authors3_c=
------>paper_class1=1
------>Impact_Factor=None
------>paper_class3=1
------>paper_class2=2
------>vol=2005
------>confirm_bywho=sihuang
------>insert_bywho=sherry
------>Jurnal_Rank=None
------>authors4_c=
------>comm_author=
------>patent_EDate=None
------>authors5_c=
------>publish_day=1
------>paper_class2Letter=None
------>page2=94
------>medlineContent=
------>unit=J0400
------>insert_date=20081124
------>iam=2
------>update_date=None
------>author=???
------>change_event=4
------>ISSN=
------>authors_c=
------>score=55
------>journal_name=Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
------>paper_name=Three-dimensional ultrasonographic findings in
------>confirm_date=20081125
------>tch_id=083024
------>pmid=19824116
------>page1=90
------>fullAbstract=AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) in the assessment of anal fistulae with and without H(2)O(2) enhancement. METHODS: Sixty-one patients (37 males, aged 17-74 years) with anal fistulae, which were not simple low types, were evaluated by physical examination and 3D-EAUS with and without enhancement. Fistula classification was determined with each modality and compared to operative findings as the reference standard. RESULTS: The accuracy of 3D-EAUS was significantly higher than that of physical examination in detecting the primary tract (84.4% vs 68.7%, P = 0.037) and secondary extension (81.8% vs 62.1%, P = 0.01) and localizing the internal opening (84.2% vs 59.7%, P = 0.004). A contrast study with H(2)O(2) detected several more fistula components including two primary suprasphincteric fistula tracks and one supralevator secondary extension, which were not detected on non-contrast study. However, there was no significant difference in accuracy between 3D-EAUS and H(2)O(2)-enhanced 3D-EAUS with respect to classification of the primary tract (84.4% vs 89.1%, P = 0.435) or secondary extension (81.8% vs 86.4%, P = 0.435) or localization of the internal opening (84.2% vs 89.5%, P = 0.406). CONCLUSION: 3D-EAUS was highly reliable in the diagnosis of an anal fistula. H(2)O(2) enhancement was helpful at times and selective use in difficult cases may be economical and reliable.
------>tmu_sno=None
------>sno=19819
------>authors2=S.-H. Yang
------>authors3=J.-M. Yang
------>authors4=
------>authors5=
------>authors6=
------>authors6_c=
------>authors=W.-C. Huang
------>delete_flag=0
------>SCI_JNo=None
------>authors2_c=
------>publish_area=0
------>updateTitle=Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonographic assessment of an anal fistula with and without H(2)O(2) enhancement.
------>language=2
------>check_flag=None
------>submit_date=None
------>country=None
------>no=25
------>patent_SDate=None
------>update_bywho=None
------>publish_year=2008
------>submit_flag=None
------>publish_month=1
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z