Taipei Medical University

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Chen YS
------>authors3_c=
------>paper_class1=1
------>Impact_Factor=2.333
------>paper_class3=2
------>paper_class2=1
------>vol=33
------>confirm_bywho=ncchang
------>insert_bywho=yungching
------>Jurnal_Rank=53.5
------>authors4_c=
------>comm_author=
------>patent_EDate=None
------>authors5_c=
------>publish_day=1
------>paper_class2Letter=None
------>page2=610
------>medlineContent=
------>unit=E0109
------>insert_date=20090312
------>iam=2
------>update_date=None
------>author=???
------>change_event=4
------>ISSN=
------>authors_c=
------>score=500
------>journal_name=Am J Infect Control
------>paper_name=Abbreviated duration of superheat-and-flush and disinfection of taps for Legionella disinfection: lessons learned from failure.
------>confirm_date=20090313
------>tch_id=097070
------>pmid=16330310
------>page1=606
------>fullAbstract=One medical center in southern Taiwan faced an outbreak of nosocomial Legionnaires~ disease; a total of 81 suspected cases were detected during an 8-month period. Baseline environmental surveillance showed that 80% of the distal sites in intensive care units (ICUs) were positive for Legionella pneumophila. Superheat-and-flush was selected for hospital water supply disinfection because it required no special equipment, and it can be initiated expeditiously. We conducted 2 episodes of superheat-and-flush based on the published recommendations from the Department of Health, Taiwan; US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers. Both flushes failed to control colonization of Legionella in the hospital water supply. The rate of distal sites positive for Legionella in wards and ICUs was 14% and 66%, respectively, 10 days after the second flush. The effect of replacement of faucets and showerheads in ICUs appeared to be insignificant in colonization of Legionella. The application of superheat-and-flush for flush duration of 5 minutes was ineffective. Superheat-and-flush may not be economic for a large medical center because it could be costly and labor intensive.
------>tmu_sno=None
------>sno=21404
------>authors2=Liu YC
------>authors3=Lee SSJ
------>authors4=Tsai HC
------>authors5=Wann SR
------>authors6=Kao CH, Chang CL, Huang WK, Huang TS, Chao HL, Li CH, Ke CM, Lin YSE
------>authors6_c=
------>authors=Chen YS
------>delete_flag=0
------>SCI_JNo=None
------>authors2_c=
------>publish_area=0
------>updateTitle=Abbreviated duration of superheat-and-flush and disinfection of taps for Legionella disinfection: lessons learned from failure.
------>language=2
------>check_flag=None
------>submit_date=None
------>country=None
------>no=
------>patent_SDate=None
------>update_bywho=None
------>publish_year=2005
------>submit_flag=None
------>publish_month=1
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z