Taipei Medical University

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Chiu WT
------>authors3_c=???
------>paper_class1=1
------>Impact_Factor=1.556
------>paper_class3=2
------>paper_class2=1
------>vol=66
------>confirm_bywho=shtsai
------>insert_bywho=cck.ns
------>Jurnal_Rank=42.6
------>authors4_c=???
------>comm_author=
------>patent_EDate=None
------>authors5_c=???
------>publish_day=1
------>paper_class2Letter=None
------>page2=42
------>medlineContent=
------>unit=J0600
------>insert_date=20091003
------>iam=5
------>update_date=None
------>author=???
------>change_event=4
------>ISSN=
------>authors_c=???
------>score=500
------>journal_name=Surgical Neurology
------>paper_name=Multicenter evaluation of propofol for head-injured patients in Taiwan.
------>confirm_date=20091005
------>tch_id=093088
------>pmid=17071254
------>page1=37
------>fullAbstract=BACKGROUND: The present study was a multicenter, retrospective study which aimed to evaluate the efficacy of propofol, a new choice of pharmacotherapy in head-injured patients. METHODS: Head-injured patients admitted to 3 hospitals during the period from January 2003 to December 2004 were included in this clinical trial. Data on patients~ demographics, laboratory data, GCS score, ICP, CPP, concurrent medications, and therapeutic outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Among the 104 patients included, only 44 were given propofol. The average age was 40.8 +/- 22 years for all patients, with 41.91 +/- 20.41 and 43.48 +/- 23.19 years for the propofol group and nonpropofol group, respectively (P=.097). There was no significant difference in baseline GCS score between the 2 groups (5.86 +/- 1.84 vs 5.66 +/- 1.59, P=.729). Mean ICP for the first 3 days in the ICU was 17.23 +/- 9.0 mm Hg in the propofol group and 33.19 +/- 32.56 in the nonpropofol group, respectively (P=.017). Mean CPP for the first 5 days in the ICU was 71.10 +/- 15.32 mm Hg in the propofol group and 43.20 +/- 29.92 mm Hg in the nonpropofol group (P<.001). A higher survival rate was found in the propofol group (81.8% vs 46.7%, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that propofol improved the outcome in recovery phase of head-injured patients.
------>tmu_sno=None
------>sno=22404
------>authors2=Lin TJ
------>authors3=Lin JW
------>authors4=Huang SJ
------>authors5=Chang CK
------>authors6=Chen HY
------>authors6_c=???
------>authors=Chiu WT
------>delete_flag=0
------>SCI_JNo=None
------>authors2_c=???
------>publish_area=0
------>updateTitle=Multicenter evaluation of propofol for head-injured patients in Taiwan.
------>language=2
------>check_flag=None
------>submit_date=None
------>country=None
------>no=S2
------>patent_SDate=None
------>update_bywho=None
------>publish_year=2006
------>submit_flag=None
------>publish_month=11
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z