Taipei Medical University

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Lin LH,Chen CS
------>authors3_c=None
------>paper_class1=2
------>Impact_Factor=None
------>paper_class3=0
------>paper_class2=0
------>vol=
------>confirm_bywho=seanlee
------>insert_bywho=lisa
------>Jurnal_Rank=None
------>authors4_c=None
------>comm_author=1
------>patent_EDate=None
------>authors5_c=None
------>publish_day=None
------>paper_class2Letter=None
------>page2=75
------>medlineContent=
------>unit=F0100
------>insert_date=20030401
------>iam=1
------>update_date=
------>author=???
------>change_event=5
------>ISSN=None
------>authors_c=None
------>score=54
------>journal_name=American Association of Orthodontists
------>paper_name=Orthodontic and orthopedic treatment of class II malocclusion
------>confirm_date=20030506
------>tch_id=073005
------>pmid=19524823
------>page1=75
------>fullAbstract=INTRODUCTION: The aim of this clinical trial was to compare the effects of 2 protocols for single-phase comprehensive treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion (bonded Herbst followed by fixed appliances [BH + FA] vs headgear followed by fixed appliances and Class II elastics [HG + FA]) at the pubertal growth spurt. METHODS: Fifty-six Class II patients were enrolled in the trial and allocated by personal choice to 2 practices, where they underwent 1 of 2 treatment protocols (28 patients were treated consecutively with BH + FA, and 28 patients were treated consecutively with HG + FA). All patients started treatment at puberty (cervical stage [CS] 3 or CS 4) and completed treatment after puberty (CS 5 or CS 6). Lateral cephalograms were taken before therapy and 6 months after the end of comprehensive therapy, with an average interval of 28 months. Longitudinal observations of a matched group of 28 subjects with untreated Class II malocclusions were compared with the 2 treated groups. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc tests was used for statistical comparisons. Discriminant analysis was applied to identify preferential candidates for the BH + FA protocol on the basis of profile changes (advancement of the soft tissues of the chin). RESULTS: The success rate (full occlusal correction of the malocclusion after treatment) was 92.8% in both treatment groups. The BH + FA group showed a significant increase in mandibular protrusion. The increase in effective mandibular length (Co-Gn) was significantly greater in both treatment groups when compared with natural growth changes in the Class II controls. Significantly greater improvement in sagittal maxillomandibular relationships was found in the BH + FA group. Retrusion of maxillary incisors and mesial movement of mandibular molars were significant in the HG + FA group. The BH + FA group showed significantly greater forward movements of soft-tissue B-point and pogonion compared with both the HG + FA and the control groups. Two pretreatment variables were significant (F = 4.48; P <0.01) in predicting the posttreatment amount of mandibular soft-tissue improvement in the BH + FA group: Co-Go-Me and pogonion to nasion perpendicular. CONCLUSIONS: Class II treatment with either protocol during the pubertal growth spurt induces significant favorable dentoskeletal and occlusal changes. Functional jaw orthopedics had a greater favorable impact on the advancement of the chin. The clinical indications for the preferential use of the Herbst appliance at puberty are a small mandibular angle and mandibular retrusion before treatment. When treated with the BH + FA protocol, these Class II patients have the greatest probability of achieving significant improvement in the profile by advancement of the soft tissues of the chin.
------>tmu_sno=None
------>sno=7008
------>authors2=None
------>authors3=None
------>authors4=None
------>authors5=None
------>authors6=None
------>authors6_c=None
------>authors=Lin LH,Chen CS
------>delete_flag=0
------>SCI_JNo=None
------>authors2_c=None
------>publish_area=None
------>updateTitle=Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
------>language=2
------>check_flag=
------>submit_date=
------>country=None
------>no=
------>patent_SDate=None
------>update_bywho=
------>publish_year=2002
------>submit_flag=
------>publish_month=None
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z